Disputes involving state purchases

REVERA’s lawyers advise clients at all stages of procurement procedures. This allows preventing and mitigating potential risks, and hence, solving client’s business problems in a most efficient way. 

Within this strand of our activities, we render the following types of legal assistance:

  • Legal consulting on state purchases, purchases from own funds, purchases for construction projects;
  • Legal consulting on state purchases of medical equipment, medical goods, medicinal agents and health foods;
  • Legal examination of policies on purchases from own funds;
  • Preparing queries seeking explanation of documents furnished to bidder;
  • Appealing decisions on listing of providers/contractors temporarily banned from state procurement procedures;
  • Appealing decisions on listing of providers/contractors temporarily banned from purchases;
  • Preparing claims in the course of various disputes relating to state purchases, purchases from own funds, purchases for construction projects;
  • Lodging an appeal in a competent state authority with regard to action/inaction/decision of a customer, organiser, commission (commission member), commodity exchange, operator of an e-commerce site, operator of an official website;
  • Lodging an appeal in a court with regard to action/inaction/decision of a customer, organiser, commission (commission member), commodity exchange, operator of an e-commerce site, operator of an official website;
  • Representation in court in disputes involving state purchases, purchases from own funds, purchases for construction projects;
  • Preparing claims of violation of antimonopoly laws, in particular with regard to unfair competition, violation of antimonopoly policies pertaining to purchases of goods.

Great problem solving skills and out of the box thinking.

IFLR 1000

Projects

Novatech

REVERA’s lawyers secured equal competitive conditions for client’s business on the part of state institutiotns organising bulk purchases. The project involved judicial proceedings contesting tender results due to violation of competition laws and contesting of actions and decisions of tender board.

A distributor of medical goods

Comprehensive advising on state purchases of medical equipment, medical goods, pharmaceutical and health food, with account of business specifity.

A distributor of road building machinery

REVERA’s attorneys defended a client whose bid was unreasonable refused during a bulk purchase procedure. In followup of the legal proceeding, the court determined that the customer, in assessing bids, including client's bid, was ambiguous in its valuation, which was a direct violation of competition laws. As a result, the purchase procedure was held invalid.

A major international supplying company

Advising on participation in state purchases procedures and purchase from own funds. REVERA’s attorneys assisted in accurate formalisation of contractual relations between a foreign supplier and distributors, which, thereafter, allowed distributors to participate successfully in state purchases procedures and purchase from own funds.

A distributor of technical goods

A tender committee refused to apply a preferential correction factor to client’s bid. REVERA’s attorneys filed a suit seeking to invalidate the purchase procedure, stating that unlawful refusal to apply a preferential correction factor to client’s bid resulted in a false determination of winner. After all, the court satisfied the stated claims in full and the purchase procedure was held invalid.

SunPharma

Appealing against a decision on state purchases of pharmaceuticals.